Evolution and classification of protozoa


Following the contemporary logic that classification need not be arbitrary but will be more informative when taxa are monophyletic and holophyletic, we have used ultrastructural studies to erect testable hypotheses (such as those included in the figure below) about relatedness. We have collaborated with the Molecular Evolution Laboratory (Marine Biological Station, Woods Hole) to test these hypotheses, and some elements - especially the basal parts of the tree - have not survived this process.

The skeletal tree of the mid '90s allowed us also to explore styles of classifying taxa. The acceptance of speculation as a criterion to erect taxa has led to considerable instability. The meanings of many taxonomic terms applied to protozoa are not clear. In part this is because little effort has been made to develop a set of rules by which taxa may be defined. Consequently, taxa are erected without a clear sense of what should be included; and secondly the meaning of the term is allowed to meander through conceptual space. As discussed in the '99 paper, much of this uncertaintly can be avoided. We hold that within the domains of classification and evolution, the taxonomic terms must aim to be unambiguous.