Graham Thompson

The phylogenetics of social evolution 

 

To study the phylogenetics of social evolution I identify clades showing variation in social characteristics, and then reconstruct over them the ancestral states of these characteristics through comparative and transformational mapping. This part of my research program is concerned with determining the macroevolutionary patterns of social life histories, thus permitting the development and testing of macroevolutionary scenarios. For example, the application of phylogeny to developing and testing models of termite social evolution has hitherto been minimal, despite the significant impact that phylogenetics could have towards resolving their widely-disputed social origins.

To this end, my collaborators and I have used molecular data from multiple genes in combination with likelihood-based models of molecular evolution to infer the phylogenetic relationships among various termite groups. First, we have demonstrated using Australian lineages of drywood termite an evolutionary correlation between social (defensive behaviour) and ecological (nest type) variables (Mol. Phylog. Evol. 17:419-429).

 
Phylogeny of Australian drywood termites showing soldier heads

Second, an order-wide phylogeny derived by us suggests, controversially, that the traditional interpretation of termite phylogeny may be out-of-date, and so too may several well-established phylogeny-dependent hypotheses concerning the evolutionary history of termite social systems (J. evol. Biol 13:869-881 and J. evol. Biol 17:217-220).

We have also re-visited the age-old question of how many times eusociality itself has evolved in the corbiculate bees (Mol. Phyl. Evol. 33:452-456). Surprisingly, no single topology can yet be accepted to the exclusion of all others, despite a large amount of molecular and morphological data. Moreover, the question of whether eusociality evolved 'once' or 'twice' depends not just on the topology, as the question has commonly been presented, but also on assumptions regarding how eusociality can evolve. The age-old question of how many times eusociality has evolved in the corbiculate bees has not yet solved.

Future objectives under this research heading will be to expand the range of characters mapped onto phylogenies to include not only phenotypic life-history polymorphisms but also, ultimately, the genotypic expression-patterns that underlie these polymorphisms.